Tag Archives: Digital artefact

Workshop looking at how digital technologies can be used by libraries for engaging people with local heritage.

LocScot is an organisation about local history in Scotland. I’m very tempted to attend this workshop, but it depends how time goes on our research project!


CILIP in Scotland are working in partnership with Robert Gordon University (RGU) to bring you this event which is part of a project called ‘Bring Your Own Heritage’. This is a project led by RGU in partnership with Moray Council to investigate how libraries can harness new technology to enhance community heritage projects.

The project is funded through the Research Councils UK (RCUK) Digital Economy network ‘IT as a Utility’ and is investigating different ways libraries can utilise technologies to capture, create and engage users with local knowledge about significant historic sites.

This event is open to anyone who may be interested and is free of charge. Places are very limited though and can be booked by e mailing Andy Grinnall at a.p.grinnall1@rgu.ac.uk.

Date: Wednesday 25th February, Sandeman Room, AK Bell Library, Perth

Time: 10am-4pm (lunch included)

Speakers: TBC soon

View original post

Evidence that Learners Have Learned

Janet Robertson, one of my classmates on the Teaching Artist course, posted to the class collaborative space on 24 April after a session on teaching styles led by Kenny McGlashan.  Sadly, I wasn’t able to attend that session – I was flying back from Luton at the time!  However, reading through the comments, I realise there is quite a bit of discussion about deep and surface learning, and also about how we know our students have learned anything.  The day after Janet’s post, course leader Andrew Comrie posted a comment about surface and deep learning.

I don’t want to quote his words verbatim without permission, even with attribution, but I’d like to make a note of his main points so that I can refer back to them.  So here they are:-

  1. “Create opportunities for learners to demonstrate … question …. and set [further] goals, eg by
  2. “Reflective Journals” [we can use these to assess learning and guide students further]
  3. “Set formative tasks in future lessons” [giving students a chance to show what they’ve learned] …. and “allow time to give formative feedback for learning” …
  4. Getting to know about our students’ learning styles and preferences helps us cater for their various preferences. Again, we need to allow time to get feedback from students, to inform us of this.
  5. People do learn at different paces – some during the class, but others “continue to process after class and use opportunities to discuss aspects of lessons with their peers and others to make sense of what is happening.” So …
  6. If we can engineer opportunities for this post-class discussion to take place, it benefits all.

I’ve been mulling over how I’m going to construct my “digital artefact” to demonstrate my practice.  This blog will be the main vehicle, but if I can, I hope to send a small survey to my postgrad researchers after the class I’m going to be leading in a couple of weeks’ time.  It would be great if I could get some feedback and share it here.