If we researchers want to have impact, then we have to get out there and make it happen. Today, I played at a concert in Dundee City Library’s Steps Theatre. The Friends of Wighton, of which I’m honorary librarian, held an afternoon concert because it’s Voluntary Arts Week, and at the same time to commemorate Jimmy Shand, because we’ve now got some of his old music scores.
Several music tutors led spots for their classes – fiddles, whistles, singing, and a youth trad music group. And a couple more of us played solo. Most of us tried to use tunes out of Jimmy Shand’s collection as part or all of our contribution.
I wasn’t directly working with community groups like the music tutors, but as it happened, I chose to play early 19th century piano variations based on EXACTLY the tune that the fiddlers commenced the afternoon with! How’s that for serendipity? Their tutor had spotted Isaac Cooper’s tune, ‘Miss Forbes’s Farewell to Banff’, copied into one of the antiquarian music manuscripts that the Friends of Wighton recently bought at auction. Meanwhile, I had found Schetky’s piano rondo on the tune in a different book, also from the Jimmy Shand collection. Schetky was a German musician who moved to London and then Edinburgh. His piano rondo is really rather nice. We’ve got the only traceable copy in the world, apart from the copy that Schetky’s daughter took to the USA, which has ended up in a sizeable collection of her music now in the Library of Congress.
Even if I hadn’t been working with an amateur group, I did take the opportunity to talk just a little bit about the music I was playing, so it gave me the opportunity to expose the music to a different audience and to explain why I thought it was important.
I recently ordered a book for the library – Mark S. Reed’s, The Research Impact Handbook, because it’s plainly vital to ensure that research doesn’t get locked ‘in the ivory tower’, but shared more widely – particularly with something as suitable for sharing, as Scottish songs and dance music. Right now, it’s on my desk to read quickly before I release it onto the library shelves!
My 9-5 working week consists of two days’ librarianship, one day’s postdoctoral musicology, and then two more days of librarianship. In principle, my evenings are my own, but I’m currently doing a PGCert (Learning and Teaching in Higher Arts Education), so if I’m going to work in my evenings, it should be towards that. It doesn’t always work that way, though. Life has a habit of getting in the way, and sometimes I have writing to do in connection with research.
Tonight, however, I’m enjoying a hiatus. I am shortly due to submit my ethical approval forms for the PGCert project, and I can’t actually do much until I get approval. The interventions are recorded. I wasn’t going to turn the questionnaire into a Survey Monkey online one, but I’m having second thoughts now, wondering whether I ought to do so. I shall seek advice, and then there should be time to create an online survey if I decide to do it.
Meanwhile, I’m sitting with an open research notebook and 68 pages of data; last Wednesday I calculated I was two-thirds of the way through transferring it into an Excel spreadsheet. I’ve reached the end of George IV’s reign, on the cusp of the data for William IV’s, and by the end of tomorrow I should be into the Victorian era. Can I resist an hour or so this evening, pushing on with the task in hand? I don’t think so! It has taken such a long time to get this far, and I really want to start producing interesting graphs – I can’t get started until the whole spreadsheet is completed.
My line-manager suggested I might consider writing an article for SCONUL Focus (a journal published by the Society of College, National and University Libraries*), since a forthcoming issue is focusing on supporting research. There was a call for writing by librarians who combine research with librarianship – and that’s me to a “T”.
I wrote my piece over the past few days, but felt that something was missing; eventually, I realised that I needed to write about my current pedagogical activities as well as my librarianship and ongoing research. I submitted it late last night; now I need to wait to see if it is what the editors were looking for!
I’ve just written a summary, partly as a record for myself and my department, but also as a progress report for all the researchers and librarians that I’ve been talking to about my latest research project. One year on, it felt like a good time to write a short summary of progress so far. Read it here. (It’s on a separate page on this blog – see the tabs above.)
It would appear that the lady cataloguer who listed St Andrews University Library’s legal deposit music, was actually English! (I’m not about to spill the beans yet, though.) I’ve had great fun finding what she borrowed – books as well as music – and I’ve even tracked down her immediate family. But BEST of all, this morning, was finding another brother. I just knew there had to be one.
And another surprise this morning was finding that, far from my initial perception that students didn’t borrow music, some borrowed an absolute mountain of music. An incredible amount! (Which means I’ll need to check whether they went on borrowing it after 1814, ho-hum. Just when I thought I only needed to investigate the professors and their friends…)
Eventually, I will have a very full picture of what the staff and students at St Andrews thought of their music collection, in the early 19th century. You’re in for a surprise!
Wednesdays are my research days, so yesterday saw me getting up at 5.30 am to go to St Andrews on a (musicologically speaking) field-trip. I discovered that, way back in 1826, the lady cataloguer of the Copyright Music Collection had what we would now call her own library account! (Well, a professor borrowed on her behalf, but she had a page in one of the books.)
My interest is in the music and the use made of it, but I must admit it was quite exciting to get a glimpse into what interested this woman when she wasn’t writing up the music catalogue!
(LATER, MONTHS LATER)
I’m astonished that this was my most popular posting! I now know so much more about this lady cataloguer. She borrowed a lot of books, especially on her favourite subjects. She identified shells, was cited in books, married in middle-age and died at a ripe old age in Islington. And … wait for this – she and I were born in the same parish in Lancaster. Quite a remarkable coincidence!
Thinking about a recent Call for Papers, I had an idea of a new angle from which to view my current research. I’ve already been looking at late Georgian music composed by women, but what if I analysed which books were used by women actually learning music?
Now, I do happen to have many pages of data, which I can interrogate in different ways. There is nothing more satisfying than – having spent hours gathering what looks like the most insignificant data – getting back home and carefully tabulating it to answer specific questions. I’ve spent days transcribing minutiae, asking myself if it’s the best use of fieldtrip time, and always concluding that yes, I do need to do this – it’s the only way to get the data that I can then interrogate, so it’s totally justified. Detailed data is what I do. I must, however, get back to St Andrews to continue capturing more data before I can see the whole picture. And I can’t go for another eleven days – so tantalising!
But to get back to the new idea … By the end of yesterday evening I had produced a new document, sorted out quite a bit of data, and there are some clear results emerging.
I probably have enough to submit an abstract, but I won’t rush into it – I’d rather sleep on it.
Confirmed speakers include:-